Tuesday, February 7, 2023
Home Feature news Vass Bednar: Legitimizing nonsense economies is the opposite of innovation

Vass Bednar: Legitimizing nonsense economies is the opposite of innovation

More regulation isn’t always needed in the case of fantasy economies such as NFTs or real estate transactions in the metaverse

Article content

Governments are constantly calibrating their policy approaches as they strive to catch up to the new realities of a digital world. But more regulation isn’t always needed in the case of fantasy, nonsense economies such as non-fungible tokens or real estate transactions in the metaverse.

Advertisement 2

Story continues below

Article content

These so-called economies boil down to get-rich schemes that tend to leave consumers in considerable debt and without satisfying recourse. Validating them with policy regimes is the equivalent of creating a central banker for Monopoly money or a bank account for Beanie Babies — a pointless pantomime.

Article content

Yet, strange schemes that invite speculative bets are being formalized by regulators. Take sports betting for example, which was made legal through a federal 2021 private member’s bill that paved the way for iGaming Ontario.

Instead of trying to generate a new venture capital-based economy in pixels, the government has actively taken an underground economy and legalized it. Is this how we are going to grow Canada’s economy moving forward — by scouring for shadow economies and bringing them onto the government’s balance sheet? One wonders whether and when we need to formalize an economy for human trafficking, organs or stolen antiquities. Maybe we should create a platform for selling blood, sperm, eggs and surrogacy while we are at it. We’re already scraping the bottom of the barrel and dressing that up as innovation anyway.

Advertisement 3

Story continues below

Article content

Sometimes it makes sense to smooth a pathway to a new marketplace. For instance, there were good reasons to legalize cannabis in Canada in 2018, though it might also be worth asking who has really benefited, besides shareholders and investors. Now other drugs are on the same pharmaceutical pathway, such as psilocybin and psilocin (magic mushrooms) and MDMA (ecstasy).

The state and innovators are constantly described as being in opposition to each other, with the government cast as a goofy laggard, slow to recognize disruptive opportunities and lethargically carving out legitimate legislative responses. Even I scowl at the excruciating regulatory lag that has come to characterize that relationship, and spend time rallying regulators to wake up and catch up. Everyone wants a legislative reality that reflects the world of today.

Advertisement 4

Story continues below

Article content

But there is a delicate dimension to when and why government should respond to new digital technologies or economies. Mostly they spring into action amid a mix of recognition, a desire to reduce harm, or to facilitate innovation. When it comes to nonsense economies, policy people need to make better use of tools already at their disposal instead of creating new regulations, and focus on rooting out fraud and taking on a preventative, advisory role.

  1. SpaceX owner and Tesla CEO Elon Musk at the E3 gaming convention in Los Angeles, California, in 2019.

    Vass Bednar: If Elon Musk can’t force Apple and Google to change their app stores, who will?

  2. Advertising on Google's search engine and YouTube brought in an estimated $6.2 billion, or $162 per Canadian, in 2021.

    Vass Bednar: Digital ads are a desperate gamble in a fantasy economy

  3. The Bank of Canada has clarified that it is not mandatory for Canadian businesses to accept cash. But maybe it should be.

    Vass Bednar: Let cash be king again — Why businesses should be forced to accept paper money

For instance, citizens who have participated in unregulated, risky, imagined economies frequently express expectations of consumer protection. Perhaps the initial role for the state is one that is both cautionary and educational — helping people understand the risks they are taking and the liability they are assuming.

Advertisement 5

Story continues below

Article content

Another under-used tool in the existing tool shed is the false and misleading advertising provisions that currently exist in the Competition Act. Policymakers should lean harder on them. Influencers who peddle fantasy lands, such as now-collapsed cryptocurrency marketplace FTX, should have something closer to fiduciary duty and assume some liability for steering consumers to illegitimate markets.

The courts can also be useful here. There is currently a class action lawsuit against the celebrities who promoted the Bored Ape Yacht Club NFTs. Bringing such players to court can help establish a new norm of added accountability for endorsements. Mere disclosures that an endorsement is an advertisement is not enough.

Advertisement 6

Story continues below

Article content

Governments already have ways to acknowledge new or existing economic activities occurring in murky marketplaces without resorting to regulatory legitimization or new laws. Slapping a basic warning label more explicit about the risks associated with sports gambling is one example. The state can use its resources to educate people while remaining vigilant against false and misleading advertising, and then punish those that dupe others into participating in the latest version of gambling.

The last couple of years have brought an explosion of grift that grasps at straws and is misinterpreted as genius. Accelerating pathways to financial ruin isn’t in the best interest of the state, even if in the short term we do witness mind-blowing bursts of innovation. Bad actors are pushing precarious schemes on consumers who may be ill-equipped to assess their notional nature. Rushing to legitimize these risky economies isn’t in anyone’s best interest. Responding with a skeptical regulatory attitude that makes better use of the tools already at policymakers’ disposal might make better sense.

Vass Bednar is an adjunct professor of political science at McMaster University and executive director of the school’s Master of Public Policy in Digital Society program.

Advertisement

Story continues below

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Cree woman leads initiative making over 100 red ribbon skirts for families of MMIWG

Jamie Smallboy remembers being on the brink of giving up after struggling with addiction, becoming homeless and being told she could never see her...

Amazon’s Luna game streaming service has lost a lot of games recently

/ Is the catalog staying fresh or is it just inconsistent? Image: The VergeLuna, Amazon’s cloud game streaming service, is set to lose...

Google announces ChatGPT rival Bard, with wider availability in ‘coming weeks’

/ Google is working on a competitor to OpenAI’s chatbot ChatGPT. The ‘experimental conversational AI service’ is called Bard and is only being...

Google Canada starts layoffs as parent company cuts 12,000 workers globally

Google sent layoff notices on Monday to affected Canadian employees after its parent company Alphabet announced earlier this year it was cutting 12,000 of...